🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.